I am a Managing Director and Solicitor at Law Lane Solicitors where I supervise a team of solicitors and caseworkers.
I was called to the Bar as a Barrister in March 2001 and in April 2006 cross-qualified to become a Solicitor of SeniorCourts of England & Wales. I am a member of The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn.
I specialise and have wide experience of litigation in Public Law and Human Rights, with an emphasis on Immigration, points-based system, asylum, nationality, EU and regulatory Law. I also oversee Criminal and Civil Litigation particularly PI and Clinical Negligence matters.
I started working in the legal profession in 1999 – initially as an outdoor clerk and later became a legal assistant and legal executive at various organisations.
In 2006 I joined as a Partner Solicitor at Shaad Solicitors.
In 2007 I joined Khans Solicitors as a Partner and remained there till 2015.
In 2015 I along with three other Partners, established Law Lane Solicitors Limited where I am currently appointed as the Managing Director as well as assuming the role of HR.
In a short span of time Law Lane has achieved innumerable qualifying accreditations marks for legal practices and meets the highest standards of technical expertise and client service in specific areas of law. For example: Lexcel, Legal 500, Immigration and Asylum quality mark, Conveyancing quality mark.
I have successfully defended in the High Court various institution Tier 4 sponsor licence revocation matters
pertaining to the TOEIC English language fiasco. I have also defended individuals who were alleged by the SSHD to have applied deception in successfully completing their TOEIC English language test. To date I have won over 90% cases and brought back a number of individuals to the UK from their country of residence due to their unlawful removal by the SSHD.
I also have a deep knowledge and expertise in Tier 1 (General) refusals under paragraph 322(5) where an applicant’s character and conduct call into question their desirability of remaining in the UK by the SSHD. I have defended and won over 90% of innocent applicant’s cases against the SSHD.
Many of my most notable cases have been presented in High Courts, Crown courts and Supreme Courts.
I represent clients from various ethnic backgrounds such as: Albanian, Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, Turkish, Sudanese, Eritrean, Ethiopian and other.
I have appeared on various television shows since 2006 for discussions on numerous legal topics.
The issue in this case is whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the leeway provided by the case of Patel (revocation of sponsor licence – fairness) India  UKUT 00211 (IAC) in relation to students whose Tier 4 (General) sponsor ceases to run the course on which they are enrolled and whether that case was rightly decided.
London St Andrew’s College, R (On the Application Of) The Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 2496 (08 November 2018) (View without highlighting):
( EWCA Civ 2496 From England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) This was an appeal against an order of McGowan J in London St Andrews College Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 4328 (Admin) dismissed the Appellant’s claim for judicial review of a decision to revoke its Tier 4 sponsor licence. Permission to appeal was granted by Arden LJ on a single ground, namely whether McGowan J had misconstrued the meaning of the phrase "any of your duties" in paragraph 162(d) of Document 3 of the Tier 4 guidance.
London College of Business Management and Information, R (on the application of) Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 3215 (Admin) (07 July 2015) (View without highlighting)
( EWHC 3215 (Admin) From England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Tier 4 sponsor licence revocation decision of the SSHD on the basis of ETS (TOIEC English language test) used by the students to obtain admission in college was quashed by the court in that found to be unlawful by the court.
Proper construction, ambit and effect of Articles 15, 31 and 35 of the Directive 2004/38/EC, Regulations 28 and 29 of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 and section 92(4)(b) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
” Tahir Shahab Khan and his team got me the best outcome in the shortest possible time on a not so hopeful looking immigration case. They are very friendly and accessible and were sometimes rather more concerned than us about the case. They prepared the case diligently and asked for some really relevant documents which in the end resulted in this desirable decision. ”
” Very pleased with their professional and quick service. Friendly and knowledgeable staff. Hats off specially to Tahir Khan, Khalid Patel and Hadeel. Solved my case and saved me a lot of worry and time without having to go court. Highly recommend. Thank you, Law Lane! ”
” Best solicitors I have ever met, worth every penny of your money, may god bless them all, would highly recommend to all my friends and family. Thanks Mr Tahir and Paresh for your great job. “
Get your free case review within 24 hours. All Fields Required.